Depopulation – cull or modified?
Is a cull proposed to make way for an eugenically modified human species?
Are some of us being culled for the planet to make way for a smaller population and possibly eugenically modified human species? It sounds frightening, almost a dystopian science fiction film. But those films have already been played out.
Take the film, Elysium (2013), a futuristic story of a luxury space station housing only the ultrarich in society, all of whom have access to everything including the best medical care. An advanced medical pod, a promising aspect of CRISPR science already in situate today, diagnosis and removal of disease in minutes while the rest of humanity struggles to survive on Earth. Or perhaps we could liken it to the film, Human Nature (2019) where ultimately the CRISPR tool gives unprecedented control over the basic building blocks of life or Rampage (2018), where CRISPR technology is designed as a Weapon of Mass Destruction as a biopharmaceutical company misuses the science, creating large animals that Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, as primatologist Okoye, struggles to reverse the CRISPR process to save his gorilla.
The desire to depopulate is certainly there. Many of the ‘Elites’ like the Rockefellers, Club of Rome, UN, Bill Gates, Henry Kissinger, WEF, have made no secret of their opinion that the world is overpopulated. Even our Royal Society is following the narrative of Agenda 21 by the UN. See here
Paul Ehrlich, a biologist from Stanford University, (why are they often from Stanford University?) contributed to the Royal Society Report in 2012 saying “But you already have 7 billion. So, we have to humanely and as rapidly as possible move to population shrinkage.”
In 1968, Ehrlich published, The Population Bomb, in which he called for immediate and draconian population control. “Humans were like parasites on the environment; humanity risked extinction by destroying its host.”
Take Dennis Meadow, an original member of the Club of Rome. Here he speaks openly about bringing down the population to around 1-2 billion, and mentions a pandemic as a possibility!
“If you want more liberty and more consumption, then you have to have fewer people. We need a very strong, smart dictatorship, and a low standard of living then we can have a billion people, but now we have 7 billion and we need to get back down. I hope this will be slow and done in a way that is relatively equal, so that people share the experience, not a few rich trying to forcing everyone else down, that’s what lies ahead”.
Even in Davos, the WEF (World Economic Forum), where one can only imagine a ‘secret global coup d’etat is beginning to be realised by more and more people, discussed the need for depopulation. There is evidence that depopulation is already occurring.
Jacques Attali, ex special advisor to Francois Mitterand and first head of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development is now a member and contributor to the WEF. In 1981, he gave an interview to Michel Salomon wherein he allegedly stated.
“But as soon as you go beyond 60/65, people live longer than they produce and they cost society dearly. Indeed, from the point of view of society, it is much better for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt than for it to deteriorate gradually. As a socialist, I am objectively opposed to extending life because it is an illusion, a false problem.”
“Euthanasia will be one of the essential instruments of our future societies in all cases. “
Perhaps, a pandemic could start the ball rolling, take out a few all at once, and mostly the elderly and vulnerable?
Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Weaponisation of the Biosphere
Chemical warfare in being used against all of us. Bill Gates said, “3 billion people must die”. “Intentionally culling the human family.” Please click on this link to hear for yourself Click here .
Now that our own Government have confirmed via Matt Hancock ‘Whatsapp leaks’ that they purposely exaggerated fear into the population regarding Covid, should we not at least listen to those who have been labelled ‘conspiracy theorists’?
Wuhan wet market was first brought to our attention as the likely cause of Covid19, however, it has now been reported that it is was very likely leaked from a lab. It is well known that these laboratories world-wide have no regulation, and even if we are fed the news that this was accidental, can we really rule out a trial run of a bioweapon on humanity?
Just recently, the WEF reported that 22 scientists have deduced that it was your fault. Yes, you are to blame for Covid19!
Just like you are to blame for Climate Change, albeit not all scientists agree . No doubt, it’s your fault for everything.
Recently a task force commissioned by the Lancet into the origins of Covid19 has closed due to a conflict of interest. Jeffrey Sachs, Chair & Economics Professor at Columbia University in New York, stated that he had shut down the scientist led investigation into how the Covid19 pandemic started because of concerns about its links to the British EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit organisation run by task force member, Peter Daszak. “A lot is going on around the world that is not properly scrutinised or explained to the public” Sachs told a newspaper. It would appear that Daszak had not always been forthright about his research and financial ties to the Wuhan Institute, an accusation denied by spokesman for EcoHealth Alliance, Robert Kessler. At a congressional hearing in May, 2021 in America about Anthony Fauci’s role as the Chief Medical Advisor, senator Rand Paul stated that “the US has been collaborating with Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Virology Institute, sharing discoveries about how to create super viruses. This gain of function research has been funded by the NIH. Fauci responded that they were entirely incorrect…the NIH had never funded gain of function research at Wuhan Institute. The Washington Post fact checked and later rated the statements as containing ‘significant omissions and/or exaggerations’. No funding was given to EcoHealth Alliance to sub-contract Wuhan Institute to support gain of function experiments.
However, Ravi Batra, lawyer and publisher and member of National Press Club and its “Freedom of Press” is suing Peter Daszak and his immunologist wife, Janet Cottingham for funding the lab-creation of SARS-CoV2, weaponizing SARS-CoV2 by transplanting cold-blooded Heterothermic Bats’ Spike Glycoprotein(s) to make it highly transmissible and virulent, and covering up the Wuhan lab-leak. Peter Daszak also received $6.5 million in US taxpayer money since ties to China were revealed, according to the Daily Mail Online.
Dr. Peter Daszak is President of EcoHealth Alliance, a US-based organization that conducts research and outreach programs on global health, conservation and international development. He is a British Zoologist and public expert on disease ecology.
He is also a member and works with the WEF.
In 2020, Daszak said in his WEF article “The overwhelming scientific evidence points to a very positive conclusion,” said Daszak. “We have the increasing ability to prevent pandemics – but the way we are tackling them right now largely ignores that ability.”
However, he fails to mention the numerous laboratories that are all unregulated and unmonitored. Here is a small list of some ‘accidents‘. He who has the power, has the upper hand.
- “Swine flu, supposedly dead for 20 years, suddenly re-emerges in 1977 as a new strain to the one in the 1950’s. Strain was genetically similar as if it had been sitting in a freezer in a lab.”
- “Singapore labour worker was inadvertently infected with SARS in 2003.”
- “A Russian scientist, in 2004, died after accidentally sticking herself with a needle contaminated with Ebola in a Siberian laboratory”.
- “2,000 vials containing the SARS virus were lost from a Parisian Institute”
- “Laboratory in Texas lost a vial containing the Guanarito virus”
- “Smallpox now eradicated due to available vaccine still sits as samples in the US and Russia”. Some scientists arguing that those vials should be destroyed in case of use in bio terrorism. As there is no cure for smallpox; it kills a third of its victims.
- “SARS – three separate lab accidents, all luckily contained, with onward transmission in one case only, may have been a lucky escape this time”.
- “Virologist in Holland has created an Avian flu that, unlike other H5N1 strains, spreads easily between ferrets – which so far have proven a reliable model for determining transmissibility in humans, and funded by National Institutes
Are we to wait like sitting ducks for the next pandemic to be announced while Governments control of laboratories, or perhaps the Elites control of laboratories, can be anything from delightfully serendipitous to deadly?
ELITES – Rockefeller memoirs
Rockefeller wrote “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. … It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
Later, he notes: “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure, one world if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
(For those of you who still do not believe that a system of a One World Government is being organised behind closed doors, even Denis Healey, (Labour MP, Chancellor of the Exchequer 1917-2015) who had been involved in Bilderberg for decades, told the Guardian “to say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So, we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.”)
The Club of Rome, which was founded in the late 1960s, held views which were “specifically designed to blame man for climate change and the destruction of earth’s resources”, and it proposed that the only way to protect the environment is through a population reduction. To shrink the population, the Club suggested that “either the birth-rate be brought down ‘to equal the new, lower death rate’, or ‘the death rate must rise again’. The Club believed that reducing the number of children a woman could have to one would resolve the environmental crisis, and as eugenicist Alan Weisman said, “reduce Earth’s population down to around 1.6 billion by 2100, about the same as the world population in 1900“.
With the Club of Rome’s ideas in place, it was only a matter of time before someone recognized them as worthy of implementation and attempted to reduce the number of children per woman to one. Enter Song Jian, a missile scientist who having attended a conference in Finland took copies of ‘The Limits of Growth and Blueprint for Survival’ published by The Club of Rome and had it implemented in China, as the ‘one child policy’ in 1978. This was popular with the Chinese Communist party and provided evidence that it was not the party to blame for 30 years of disastrous misrule, but the very existence of the Chinese people!
China’s ‘one child policy’, which started around the early 1980’s, has proven to have returned disastrous affects today. China is facing a structural contradiction between economic growth and caring for the elderly unprecedented in human history.
In June 1975, the Indian premier, Indira Gandhi, declared a state of emergency after accusations of corruption threatened her government. Her son Sanjay used the measure to introduce radical population control measures targeted at the poor.
The Indian emergency lasted less than two years, but in 1975 alone, some eight million Indians – mainly poor men – were sterilised. There remains to this day schemes to sterilise the less well-off, often in return for financial incentives. In effect, say critics, this amounts to coercion, since the very poor find it hard to reject cash.
It has recently been announced that scientists have managed to breed between male mice. Changing their genetic coding and chromosomes, making the female species defunct. Is this what lies ahead for the population of women?
Scientists’ warning on population – ScienceDirect
From ScienceDirect, scientists are discussing population with Paul Ehrlich, mentioned above, contributing. “The first line of action is the global appeal for all men and women to have no more than one child. Individuals who aspire to have a large family must opt for adoption, which is a compassionate choice for children who need to be cared for.
Studies have shown that nations with high gender inequalities exhibit higher fertility rates. Thus, enhancing gender equality by providing better job opportunities, education, and legal rights for women could aid in population control.
Several demographers have reported that, on average, women with education and child planning services desire fewer children as compared to others without access to education and family planning services.
There is a need for “Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE)” for all countries, including wealthy, middle-income, and poor nations, which shapes young people’s quality of life. CSE has resulted in a significant reduction in unintended pregnancies, which has contributed to population deceleration. Moreover, critical thinking about sexuality empowers an individual to make an informed decision about family planning.
There is a need to embrace CSE across the political spectrum to enhance the awareness of gay rights issues. This information will similarly help reduce abortion rates and the occurrence of unwanted pregnancies that arise due to lack of awareness.“
The scientists of the current study also support introducing the redistribution of global wealth tax to address issues related to poverty alleviation and conditions of impoverishment.
“Global wealth redistribution should be directed towards family-planning services, which can involve increasing the availability of contraceptives to people in rural and urban settings. Additional funds can be allocated to educate men about vasectomy as a safe option, as well as for building schools and other educational institutes.”
In the book, The Fourth Industrial Revolution by Klaus Schwab, it states “It’s important to appreciate that the Fourth Industrial Revolution involves a systemic change across many sectors and aspects of human life: the crosscutting impacts of emerging technologies are even more important than the exciting capabilities they represent. Our ability to edit the building blocks of life has recently been massively expanded by low-cost gene sequencing and techniques such as CRISPR; the result of all this is societal transformation (Karl Marx) at a global scale.”
On genetic engineering, Jacques Attali, WEF contributor and ex head of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development said “With genetic engineering we could gradually create the conditions for humanity to assume itself freely, but collectively, or else create the conditions for a new commodity, genetic this time, which would be made up of copies of humans sold to humans, chimeras or hybrids used as slaves, robots, means of work.”
So what is CRISPR
CRISPR is the basis of a revolutionary gene editing system. One day, it could make it possible to do everything from resurrect extinct species to develop cures for chronic disease, or even manipulate to alter a cell’s genetic code however we want. It has taken off in the science world but still far from realising its potential or possible dangers.
It is possible to abuse the genetic selection criteria depending upon who has the power at the time; just like in the film ‘Human Nature’, deliberately excluding people and groups judged to be inferior or promoting those judged to be superior. Those in power can then control the population by creating them infertile and birth rates controlled and manufactured by gene editing and artificial gestation.
Gain of Function Research
(GoF research or GoFR) is medical research that genetically alters an organism in a way that may enhance the biological functions of gene products. This may include an altered pathogenesis, transmissibility, or host range, i.e., the types of hosts that a microorganism can infect. Significant debate has taken place in the scientific community on how to assess risk-benefit of gain-of-function research, and how to engage the public in deliberations for policymaking. These concerns encompass biosafety, relating to the accidental release of a pathogen into the population, or intentional release of a pathogen into the population. Again, it relates to whoever has the control and power.
Historically, eugenicists have attempted to alter human gene pools by excluding people and groups judged to be inferior or promoting those judged to be superior. In recent years, the term has seen a revival in bioethical discussions on the usage of new technologies such as CRISPR and genetic screening, with a heated debate on whether these technologies should be called eugenics or not.
In the past, The American eugenics movement received extensive funding from various corporate foundations including the Carnegie Institution, Rockefeller Foundation, and the Harriman railroad fortune.
While ostensibly about improving genetic quality, it has been argued that eugenics was more about preserving the position of the dominant groups in the population. Scholarly research has determined that people who found themselves targets of the eugenics movement were those who were seen as unfit for society—the poor, the disabled, the mentally ill, and specific communities of colour (Wikipedia).
“We’ve grown fat, apathetic and miserable,” all the while leaving the planet parched. The solution? A 90% reduction“
said Eric Pianka, a herpetologist, and voted Texas Distinguished Scientist of 2006, University of Texas ecologist.
AIDS is not an efficient killer, he explained, because it is too slow. His favourite candidate for eliminating 90% of the world’s population is airborne Ebola, because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. “Every one of you who gets to survive has to bury nine,” Eric Pianka cautioned students and guests in his speech at St. Edward’s University.
Pianka’s words are part of what he calls his “doomsday talk”—a 45-minute presentation outlining humanity’s ecological misdeeds and Pianka’s predictions about how nature, or perhaps humans themselves, will exterminate all but a fraction of civilization.
So are there plans to ‘cull’ the world? Operation Lockup seem to think so.
This makes for frightening reading. No doubt, we will wait and allow it to happen just like we allowed our children to be force fed their ideology in schools and universities; to dictate that we should all give up meat and allow prices to soar in order to meet their narrative; to allow farmers to soon lose their lands so that they can control the people by having the power over the food chain; to allow our Net Zero in order to take over our energy and costs; the climate change scam to put fear into people – what will it take to fight back before its too late?